Home

May 26th, 2007


01:32 am - Plans for duh summer in order.
I'll probably cross-post this to Facebook hehehe:

1) Get better @ Spanish!
2) GET A JOB!
3) Learn Japanese participles by heart for a good foundation in Japanese
4) Go over at least two people's houses because I'm a loser and I don't go anywhere
5) Hit the 10,000 songs mark, and actually listen to at least 3/4's of them lmao. I can probably do this by downloading about 5 gigs of jazz music I have in my favorites which I never got to getting =)
6) Community service =/ Probably should be higher lol
7) Learn hiragana (maybe katakana? Jamie, what's better to learn first?)
8) Paint something of epic proportions
9) Conquer Slovakia and rename it
10) Have a frappuccino for the first time in my life

Let's see how much of this I actually get to doing!

(2 posts | Reply)

May 23rd, 2007


07:00 pm - Hai
I am mad. My teacher won't let me do a research paper on the legalization of drugs. This upsets me because it's such an easy subject to do. >=( So, out of ideas on what to do, I decided to go with gun control. Being a libertarian, I am against really strict gun control.

Anyway, I want you guys to critique one of my arguments for my new subject: gun control. It's not in it's final form (obviously, I mean I'm using a bit of political innuendo in the first sentence :P), it's just an informal rough idea about Virginia Tech and contrasting Cho to other murderers.

Okay, here I go:

Virginia Tech is going to be liberal backwash for the next century. No lie. Cho was a person who bought his guns LEGALLY and killed 32 people. And you don't need to be a gun activist to see how pointing this incident out specifically is fallacious, too. There are two reasons why it is, both related to one another:

First, Cho was like any other murderer out there in the sense that it was bad for him to have a gun! Never mind how many he killed, the fact is, he killed people unjustly. He should be compared to other gunmen in that sense, not contrasted.

Secondly, that brings me to the fact that, in it's core, it's an "appeal to emotion" argument.

I won't use the historian's fallacy and assume he would have just bought the guns illegally if he desperate enough, but that's not to say it isn't possible or, given his insanity, an unlikely scenario.


Any problems with my argument?

(2 posts | Reply)

May 4th, 2007


04:37 pm - haha
Haha what the hell, 4-ch:

When I watch The Melancholy of Suzumiya Haruhi, I am reminded of Parkinson's disease, an affliction of the brain causing characteristic movement abnormalities that appears mainly in elderly people. We know the cause of Parkinson's: the death of about 80% of neurons in the substantia nigra, a small area of the midbrain critical to motor functions. We do not know the cause of the cause. It has been speculated that a mild and insidious neurotoxin, specific to the substantia nigra, slowly kills off enough neurons to manifest as Parkinson's late in life. However, this does not explain the greatest mystery: why does Parkinson's disease occur only in humans? Not a single case of idiopathic Parkinson's has been observed in our closest relatives, chimpanzees, or in any other primate.

What does a thorny problem in neuroscience have to do with a hit anime series? Well, the late neurologist Harold Klamans proposed a novel theory in his essay "Manganese Miners": humans are susceptible to Parkinson's because of the demise of natural selection among us. Herbivores that a little slow are soon devoured by predators. Carnivores that are a little slow are gored by their supposed prey or simply starve, unable to catch anything. Humans that are a little slow are coddled, given physical therapy, and allowed to pass on their genes and create even slower humans.

As a consequence, humans have the least robust substantia nigras in the animal kingdom, and they're only going to get worse. This degradation makes us uniquely susceptible to Parkinson's disease. However, the point of all this is is: by no means is this devolution unique to one small portion of the brain or body.

Mikuru Asahina, in my scientific opinion, represents the finest fictional example of devolution to date. As a chrononaut, she is surely the finest that her future society has to offer; yet she is a weak-willed crybaby, and frankly quite stupid. We see in episode 7 that she lacks a grasp of even elementary physics, suggesting that her apparent knowledge of the workings of the time-stream is rote repetition. If she is the best, it's hard to imagine what the populace of the future must be like, nor how they managed to develop time travel. I suspect a situation similar to Cyril M. Kornbluth's science-fiction tale "The Marching Morons," in which a small number of elite have preserved their intelligence through careful breeding, and rule over a mass of idiots.

The question arises, of course, as to why those elite would send one of the idiots and not one of their own. Perhaps the elite would be too easily seduced by a world full of people of comparable intelligence, too tempted to flee from their mission and never return to their lonely perch above a milling herd of imbeciles. Mikuru Asahina, with the intelligence of a cow, is far more trustworthy; she does not have the creativity or the spirit to stray from her mission parameters.

I applaud the team behind The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya for their realization of the dark future that awaits us. I condemn them for concealing it behind layers of comedy and irrelevant posturing, so only the most astute may recognize the true meaning of the show. All of the people of Earth must be informed of the downward spiral of genetic deterioration they are progressing along, before they are too stupid to comprehend it, so that they may wholeheartedly support the eugenics programs necessary to save our proud human race.


As awesome as this essay is.... well, this goes along with something I just can't express enough: Interpreters suck. I hate interpreting literature for this sole reason. I guarantee everybody that 1/2 of the non-blatant meanings and messages in works of art are purely unintentional. Being an artist of all forms myself, one who even generally tries to incorporate themes into art, I, myself, actually go into my more epic pieces of work later and see if there's anything beyond the general meaning I added, and to much avail.

People usually just make art the way it is because to them it's really fucking awesome.

You can pretty much put a theme into anything. Example: "someone frowning and wearing a whole bunch of makeup" generally doesn't imply anything, yet somebody could go and say, "well this means that looking pretty doesn't mean you're happy." The difference between this and a blatant meaning would be, oh, her surrounded by a bunch of bad-looking people smiling and she's a bit left out with some space around her as if she's an outcast.

To be frank, Melancholy definitely isn't a shallow show and it's very open to philosophical crap, but this is WAY over the top. I can't imagine that the people who made the show actually thought of this.

It's still a cool essay.

(Reply)

April 4th, 2007


04:40 pm - Heh
He's still alive.

Just a matter of time.

(Reply)

April 1st, 2007


06:28 pm - omg
Random journal entries for the win.

I won't brag about knowing pretty much any language outside of English and a very small bit of Spanish (unlike math, where I'll get carried away and brag about knowing concepts I can barely wrap my head around :P), but when *studying* ("fooling around" probably fits in better than "studying") French I found out there are TWO ways to say yes in French: si and oui. Si is used for negative questions (like "you're not ___?") Man, I always get so confused when people ask me stuff like that -__- I wish English had something like that. I always used to freak out when answering negative questions because I didn't know how to answer them without having meant the other.

Don't you? :P Haha.

Man, every language has its ups and downs. So many ways to misinterpret things. Someone should develop a super language that combines every "good" thing about every language into one super awesome language. It would be like, "sdlsjkd sdfsal jlbhng vskdfpoasdv nx, vj nvr9o nvmdnvjd!"

(3 posts | Reply)

Carbo's Journal

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> User Info
> previous 5 entries

Links
DeviantART
Get Firefox Damnit

Advertisement

> previous 5 entries
> Go to Top
LiveJournal.com